Feedback Form

End of bundling ban in sight

iphone

The ban has been in force for 70 years, but hit the headlines again last year when Apple launched its iPhone here, available only through mobile phone operator Mobistar. In other countries, sale of the iPhone goes hand-in-hand with the sale of a subscription plan, which usually results in the iPhone costing much less than the €500 officially charged.

The case was originally brought to Luxembourg by the motoring organisation VAB, which complained about an offer at Total gas stations of three weeks free breakdown assistance for every 25 litres of petrol bought. The VAB claimed the offer broke the law; the court ruled that the law is itself unlawful.

Enterprise minister Vincent Van Quickenborne, a strong supporter of scrapping the ban, immediately said he would see that the law is brought into line with European rules. Van Quickenborne was last year famously photographed in parliament using an iPhone before they were officially on sale here.

Not everyone is in favour of abolishing the ban, however. Ivo Mechels of the consumer organisation Test-Aankoop pointed to disadvantages in the system where bundling is allowed. “In the Netherlands an iPhone cost only €80, easily six times cheaper than in Belgium. But whoever bought one was obliged to take out a subscription for €45 a month for at least two years,” he said.

Examples of product bundling:

  • Car dealer Cardoen offered a small car to every purchaser of a new, larger model.
  • A man in the Netherlands offered a free aeroplane to whoever bought his hard-to-sell house in IJburg, east of Amsterdam.
  • A free book given away with Humo and a free CD with De Morgen led to complaints from booksellers and record shops in Flanders.
  • The European Parliament protested at printer manufactures who make their customers pay for expensive ink cartridges made for particular machines. No action was taken.
  • Products which together form a whole are allowed to be bundled by the law. Examples have included trousers and a jacket forming a suit, kitchen cupboards and appliances, but not a tennis racket and tennis balls.
(April 28, 2009)