This table lists all the recorded votes for this poll. If anonymous users are allowed to vote, they will be identified by the IP address of the computer they used when they voted.
| Visitor | Vote | Timestamp |
| lisa.bradshaw | No, but lights should be better co-ordinated to allow more efficient traffic flow: Think green wave | 9 Feb 2025 |
| textcetra | No, but lights should be better co-ordinated to allow more efficient traffic flow: Think green wave | 9 Feb 2025 |
| sarah.crew | No, but lights should be better co-ordinated to allow more efficient traffic flow: Think green wave | 9 Feb 2025 |
| robyneboyle | No, but lights should be better co-ordinated to allow more efficient traffic flow: Think green wave | 9 Feb 2025 |
| hans.deloore.7 | No, but lights should be better co-ordinated to allow more efficient traffic flow: Think green wave | 9 Feb 2025 |
| andy.furniere | No, but lights should be better co-ordinated to allow more efficient traffic flow: Think green wave | 9 Feb 2025 |
| ah | Absolutely not. How would pedestrians get across the street? They risk their lives as it is | 9 Feb 2025 |
| sally.tipper | No, but lights should be better co-ordinated to allow more efficient traffic flow: Think green wave | 10 Feb 2025 |
| mart.thorpe | Absolutely not. How would pedestrians get across the street? They risk their lives as it is | 10 Feb 2025 |
| linda.thompson | No, but lights should be better co-ordinated to allow more efficient traffic flow: Think green wave | 11 Feb 2025 |
| els.debbaut | No, but lights should be better co-ordinated to allow more efficient traffic flow: Think green wave | 11 Feb 2025 |
| patrick.wynne | Yes! A thousand times yes. This would radically improve traffic flow and decrease tailbacks | 16 Feb 2025 |