UN questions Zwarte Piet tradition

Summary

The chief rapporteur of a UN working group has sparked an angry debate in the Netherlands and Belgium with accusations of racism in regards to Zwarte Piet, the helper of Sinterklaas

Folk tradition sparks heated debate

A heated debate over the exact nature of Zwarte Piet, the helper of St Nicholas, or Sinterklaas in Dutch, has been exaggerated, according to Jozef De Witte, director of the Centre for Equal Opportunities and the Fight Against Racism. He called for a “serene” debate on the question of old folk traditions.
 

The debate was sparked in the Netherlands, where the question arises at regular intervals in the season leading up to 6 December, the saint’s holy day when children across the Netherlands and Belgium receive gifts.

In both countries, Sinterklaas is accompanied by a number of helpers called Zwarte Piet, dressed in costumes of Moorish pages, wearing curly afro wigs and painting their faces black. The role of Zwarte Piet is to hand out sweets and gifts to good children and to punish the naughty, usually, according to legend, by carrying them off in a sack to Spain.

Critics point out that Zwarte Piet is racist, a symbol of the days of slavery. The blackface worn by those taking part is considered an obvious sign of this. Supporters, of whom there are a great many, even in the most progressive media, argue that Piet is black from soot stains incurred when he goes down the chimney and that he represents an Arab dealer who helped the historical St Nicholas rescue children from the slave trade.

The matter has now come to the attention of the United Nations, after the Dutch government applied to have its Sinterklaas festivities included in the world cultural heritage register, a recognition handed out to local traditions, including in Flanders the Aalst Carnival and the Procession of the Holy Blood in Bruges.

“You can’t claim to be world heritage and at the same time ignore a number of international norms like the UN treaty on racism,” De Witte said. He said, however,  that Zwarte Piet was not a symbol of intentional racism. “I don’t think Zwarte Piet needs to worry about being taken off in handcuffs.”

Update 28 October

UN spokesperson Xabier Celaya has moved to distance the UN from the Zwarte Piet controversy, stating the letter addressed to the Dutch government did not represent UN policy. The letter was sent by Verene Shepherd, chief rapporteur to the Working Group of Experts on people of African descent. However, Shepherd, a professor of social history in Jamaica, is an outside consultant to the UN, not an official, Celaya said. The UN itself will not be carrying out any investigation of Zwarte Piet, nor asking the Dutch government to cancel the event.

About the author

1 comment
Bianca JacobsI think it would be a big mistake to abolish this festivity. Sinterklaas is so important to the children, especially the children in The Netherlands and Belgium. Children look forward to it every year. They don't think that Zwarte Piet is a colored person and the parents do not either. Most parents tell their children that the reason they are black is because they have to go into every chimney. Zwarte Piet is just Sinterklaas’s helper and nothing more. Racism has nothing to do with it, every Zwarte Piet does is to make children happy and they don’t mind doing that! If the UN would abolish this festivity, I think a lot of people would become very angry and it would not solve anything because there are few people who see the festivity as racism. I also find it a bit ridiculous; this festivity has been a tradition for how many years? And now some people have a problem with it? I just don't understand... why would you take a festivity away that makes millions of children happy? But I agree with this article, I don’t think Zwarte Piet has to worry. Sinterklaas is a traditional festivity and a lot of people like it a lot, so I do not think that it is going do disappear that quickly.

Add comment

Log in or register to post comments